illegality$37477$ - traducción al español
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:     

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

illegality$37477$ - traducción al español

COMMON LAW DOCTRINE
Ex turpi causa; Illegality defence; Illegality defense

illegality      
n. ilegalidad, crimen, ilegitimidad, ilicitud
ex turpi causa         
de causa ilegal (demanda de origen ilegal)
misdeed         
ACT THAT IS ILLEGAL OR IMMORAL
Illegality; Wrongness; Miscreants; Wrong doing; Wrongdoer; Wrong doer; Wrong-doer; Wrong-doing; Wrongdoers; Wrong doers; Wrong-doers; Wrongful act; Wrongs; Legal wrong; Violation of laws; Violation of law; Legal wrongs; Wrong; Law violation; Legal violation; Violation of the law; Violations of the law; Wrongly; Misdeed
(n.) = fechoría, falta, delito
Ex: By preserving and ensuring access to the sordid history told in the tales of the tobacco industry documents, there is hope that as a nation we will not allow a repeat of the mistakes and misdeeds of the past.

Definición

wrongdoing
(wrongdoings)
Wrongdoing is behaviour that is illegal or immoral.
The city attorney's office hasn't found any evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
N-VAR

Wikipedia

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio (Latin "from a dishonorable cause an action does not arise") is a legal doctrine which states that a plaintiff will be unable to pursue legal relief and damages if it arises in connection with their own tortious act. Particularly relevant in the law of contract, tort and trusts, ex turpi causa is also known as the illegality defence, since a defendant may plead that even though, for instance, he broke a contract, conducted himself negligently or broke an equitable duty, nevertheless a claimant by reason of his own illegality cannot sue. The UK Supreme Court provided a thorough reconsideration of the doctrine in 2016 in Patel v Mirza.